Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

What is the Visual Cognition Gap between Humans and Multimodal LLMs?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.10424 v2 pith:3TAQVHLI submitted 2024-06-14 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords visualcognitionmllmsmars-vqareasoningqwen2-vcogavailablebaseline
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) and Vision Language Models (VLMs) have shown great promise in language-guided perceptual tasks such as recognition, segmentation, and object detection. However, their effectiveness in addressing visual cognition problems that require high-level multi-image reasoning and visual working memory is not well-established. One such challenge is matrix reasoning - the cognitive ability to discern relationships among patterns in a set of images and extrapolate to predict subsequent patterns. This skill is crucial during the early neurodevelopmental stages of children. Inspired by the matrix reasoning tasks in Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPM) and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC), we propose a new dataset MaRs-VQA to evaluate the visual cognition capability of MLLMs and compare their performance with existing human visual cognition studies. Based on the training data of MaRs-VQA, we also finetune a baseline model Qwen2-VCog with multi-stage cognition reasoning annotations. Our comparative experiments with different baselines reveal a gap between MLLMs and human intelligence, highlighting the visual cognitive limitations of current MLLMs. We believe that the public release of MaRs-VQA and the Qwen2-VCog baseline model will drive progress toward the next generation of MLLMs with human-like visual cognition abilities. MaRs-VQA is available at huggingface.co/datasets/IrohXu/VCog-Bench. The training code of Qwen2-VCog is available at github.com/IrohXu/Cognition-MLLM.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. LEVANTE-bench: Multi-Scale Comparison of VLMs to Children Using Cognitive Tasks (or, "Is Your VLM Smarter Than a 5th Grader?")

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    VLMs show partial alignment with children's performance on six cognitive tasks, with stronger models matching better at task and item levels but struggling on matrix reasoning and mental rotation.

  2. SPHINX: A Synthetic Environment for Visual Perception and Reasoning

    cs.CV 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    SPHINX generates synthetic visual puzzles for benchmarking LVLMs, where GPT-5 scores 51.1% and RLVR training improves both in-domain and external visual reasoning performance.

  3. CogniRoute: Learning to Route Social Evidence in Omni-Modal Models

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    CogniRoute adds a cognitive schema and route-aware RL to an omni-modal MoE, reaching 59.38% accuracy on a new 118K-example social video QA benchmark and beating prior baselines by 15-27 points.

  4. Detecting Hope, Hate, and Emotion in Arabic Textual Speech and Multi-modal Memes Using Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

    The submission cannot be reviewed as a coherent paper: its abstract and full text are two different papers, so the abstract's claims have no supporting body.

Pith tools