REVIEW 2 cited by
STAR: SocioTechnical Approach to Red Teaming Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This research introduces STAR, a sociotechnical framework that improves on current best practices for red teaming safety of large language models. STAR makes two key contributions: it enhances steerability by generating parameterised instructions for human red teamers, leading to improved coverage of the risk surface. Parameterised instructions also provide more detailed insights into model failures at no increased cost. Second, STAR improves signal quality by matching demographics to assess harms for specific groups, resulting in more sensitive annotations. STAR further employs a novel step of arbitration to leverage diverse viewpoints and improve label reliability, treating disagreement not as noise but as a valuable contribution to signal quality.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
WeAudit: Scaffolding User Auditors and AI Practitioners in Auditing Generative AI
WeAudit scaffolds everyday users to audit generative AI through comparison, examples, discussion, verification, and structured reports, and practitioners found the resulting audit reports actionable.
-
A theory of appropriateness with applications to generative artificial intelligence
A theory that human and AI behavior is guided by context-dependent appropriateness implemented as predictive pattern completion, with norms as conventional sanctioning patterns.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.