Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Close Encounter of Three Black Holes III

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.11985 v1 pith:6Q64DTER submitted 2024-06-17 gr-qc astro-ph.HE

Close Encounter of Three Black Holes III

classification gr-qc astro-ph.HE
keywords holebinaryblackmergerconfigurationsthirdcasesclosest
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

We revisit the three black hole scenario with numerical relativity techniques to study hierarchical configurations where the inner binary contains highly spinning black holes. We find that the merger time of the binary gets a delay (with a number of orbits to merger increase), depending strongly with the distance to the orbiting third hole $D$ as $\sim1/D^{1.6\pm0.1}$. Notably, a different dependence from what we had found in the nonspinning case, $\sim1/D^{2.5}$. We interpret this effect as mostly due to a spin-orbit coupling between the third hole and the closest member of the binary in the successive approaches. This lead us next to study scattering configurations of the third hole with the binary in order to evaluate the extent of this ``sudden'' interactions, finding also a correlation of the delay in merger times with the closest distance, even for the nonspinning cases. We then explore the mass ratio dependence of the triple system by modeling binaries orbiting a larger black hole bearing masses ratios 8:1:1 and 18:1:1 in co-orbiting or counter-orbiting configurations, finding merger times increasing with increasing mass ratios and for the counter-orbiting cases.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Ringdown and lensing of triple systems

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Numerical relativity simulations of triple black hole systems reveal redshift effects and gravitational lensing in ringdown signals from head-on mergers, with no additional black hole formation from amplified waves.

  2. Ringdown and lensing of triple systems

    gr-qc 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    Head-on black-hole mergers next to a companion show Doppler- and redshift-shifted ringdown, lensing magnification behind the lens, and delayed echo images, with only tentative signs of resonant mode excitation.

  3. Spin-up and mass-gain in hyperbolic encounters of spinning black holes

    gr-qc 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Numerical relativity simulations of equal-mass black holes with initial spins from -0.7 to 0.7 in hyperbolic encounters find maximum spin-up of 0.3 and mass increase of 15%, with spin-up decreasing linearly with initi...

  4. Spin-up and mass-gain in hyperbolic encounters of spinning black holes

    gr-qc 2025-10 accept novelty 6.0

    Scattering black holes gain spin and mass by absorbing emitted gravitational radiation, with spin-up up to 0.3 and mass gain up to 15% in near-threshold encounters.

  5. The LISA Astrophysics MBHcatalogues Project: A comparison of predictions of simulated massive black hole binaries

    astro-ph.GA 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A large collaboration compiles and compares merger rate predictions for massive black holes across multiple galaxy formation models to forecast LISA detections and quantify uncertainties.

  6. Parameter Estimation with Targeted Eccentric Numerical-Relativity Simulations for GW200208_22 and GW190620

    gr-qc 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Bayesian parameter estimation with targeted eccentric numerical-relativity waveforms yields eccentricity estimates of e20 ≈ 0.2 for GW200208_22 and e10 ≈ 0.19 for GW190620, reinforcing the eccentric hypothesis.