REVIEW 2 cited by
PlanRAG: A Plan-then-Retrieval Augmented Generation for Generative Large Language Models as Decision Makers
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this paper, we conduct a study to utilize LLMs as a solution for decision making that requires complex data analysis. We define Decision QA as the task of answering the best decision, $d_{best}$, for a decision-making question $Q$, business rules $R$ and a database $D$. Since there is no benchmark that can examine Decision QA, we propose Decision QA benchmark, DQA. It has two scenarios, Locating and Building, constructed from two video games (Europa Universalis IV and Victoria 3) that have almost the same goal as Decision QA. To address Decision QA effectively, we also propose a new RAG technique called the iterative plan-then-retrieval augmented generation (PlanRAG). Our PlanRAG-based LM generates the plan for decision making as the first step, and the retriever generates the queries for data analysis as the second step. The proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art iterative RAG method by 15.8% in the Locating scenario and by 7.4% in the Building scenario, respectively. We release our code and benchmark at https://github.com/myeon9h/PlanRAG.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
KAMR: Grounding Generation via Knowledge-Aligned Multi-hop Retrieval
Partial-alignment contrastive pretraining plus anchor-then-expand graph retrieval improves multi-hop KG evidence recovery and downstream QA over strong dense and graph RAG baselines.
-
SLA Management in Reconfigurable Multi-Agent RAG: A Systems Approach to Question Answering
A systems architecture for SLA-driven reconfiguration of multi-agent RAG is described, but the central reconfiguration claim is not validated by experiments.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.