Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Unified Active Retrieval for Retrieval Augmented Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.12534 v4 pith:EAIMZ3YM submitted 2024-06-18 cs.CL

Unified Active Retrieval for Retrieval Augmented Generation

classification cs.CL
keywords retrievalactivetasksunifiedchallengescriteriadownstreamexisting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

In Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), retrieval is not always helpful and applying it to every instruction is sub-optimal. Therefore, determining whether to retrieve is crucial for RAG, which is usually referred to as Active Retrieval. However, existing active retrieval methods face two challenges: 1. They usually rely on a single criterion, which struggles with handling various types of instructions. 2. They depend on specialized and highly differentiated procedures, and thus combining them makes the RAG system more complicated and leads to higher response latency. To address these challenges, we propose Unified Active Retrieval (UAR). UAR contains four orthogonal criteria and casts them into plug-and-play classification tasks, which achieves multifaceted retrieval timing judgements with negligible extra inference cost. We further introduce the Unified Active Retrieval Criteria (UAR-Criteria), designed to process diverse active retrieval scenarios through a standardized procedure. Experiments on four representative types of user instructions show that UAR significantly outperforms existing work on the retrieval timing judgement and the performance of downstream tasks, which shows the effectiveness of UAR and its helpfulness to downstream tasks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When Iterative RAG Beats Ideal Evidence: A Diagnostic Study in Scientific Multi-hop Question Answering

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 7.0

    Iterative RAG outperforms Gold Context RAG by up to 25.6 points on ChemKGMultiHopQA across 11 LLMs, mainly by staging retrieval to avoid context overload and correct hypothesis drift.

  2. When Iterative RAG Beats Ideal Evidence: A Diagnostic Study in Scientific Multi-hop Question Answering

    cs.CL 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0

    On ChemKGMultiHopQA, iterative retrieval-reasoning outperformed oracle gold-context static RAG for all 11 LLMs tested, with gains up to 25.6 percentage points.

  3. A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions

    cs.CL 2023-11 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The paper surveys hallucination in LLMs with an innovative taxonomy, factors, detection methods, benchmarks, mitigation strategies, and open research directions.