REVIEW 5 cited by
MultiAgent Collaboration Attack: Investigating Adversarial Attacks in Large Language Model Collaborations via Debate
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown exceptional results on current benchmarks when working individually. The advancement in their capabilities, along with a reduction in parameter size and inference times, has facilitated the use of these models as agents, enabling interactions among multiple models to execute complex tasks. Such collaborations offer several advantages, including the use of specialized models (e.g. coding), improved confidence through multiple computations, and enhanced divergent thinking, leading to more diverse outputs. Thus, the collaborative use of language models is expected to grow significantly in the coming years. In this work, we evaluate the behavior of a network of models collaborating through debate under the influence of an adversary. We introduce pertinent metrics to assess the adversary's effectiveness, focusing on system accuracy and model agreement. Our findings highlight the importance of a model's persuasive ability in influencing others. Additionally, we explore inference-time methods to generate more compelling arguments and evaluate the potential of prompt-based mitigation as a defensive strategy.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
ACIArena: Toward Unified Evaluation for Agent Cascading Injection
ACIArena provides a unified specification, attack suites across external inputs, profiles, and messages, plus 1,356 test cases over six MAS implementations, demonstrating that topology alone is insufficient for robust...
-
To trust or not to trust: Attention-based Trust Management for LLM Multi-Agent Systems
Introduces six-dimension trustworthiness definition and attention-based A-Trust score with a TMS to improve LLM-MAS robustness against malicious or unreliable messages.
-
Dive into Ambiguity: A*-Inspired Multi-Agents Commonsense Obfuscation Attack on LLM Prompts
An A*-inspired multi-agent framework with hierarchical rewriting and a dynamic gamma parameter generates obfuscated prompts that achieve higher LLM attack success rates with fewer attempts than exhaustive search.
-
Insider Attacks in Multi-Agent LLM Consensus Systems
A malicious agent in multi-agent LLM consensus systems can be trained via a surrogate world model and RL to reduce consensus rates and prolong disagreement more effectively than direct prompt attacks.
-
Securing Multi-Agent Systems Against Corruptions via Node Contribution Backpropagation
A backward-propagation scoring scheme over a signed temporal DAG can identify malicious agents in LLM multi-agent systems and cut their communications, improving defended accuracy by 3–7 percentage points in the autho...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.