Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Twin-Merging: Dynamic Integration of Modular Expertise in Model Merging

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.15479 v2 pith:QIAZTPDD submitted 2024-06-17 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords mergingmodelmodelsperformanceknowledgedataexclusivefine-tuned
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

In the era of large language models, model merging is a promising way to combine multiple task-specific models into a single multitask model without extra training. However, two challenges remain: (a) interference between different models and (b) heterogeneous data during testing. Traditional model merging methods often show significant performance gaps compared to fine-tuned models due to these issues. Additionally, a one-size-fits-all model lacks flexibility for diverse test data, leading to performance degradation. We show that both shared and exclusive task-specific knowledge are crucial for merging performance, but directly merging exclusive knowledge hinders overall performance. In view of this, we propose Twin-Merging, a method that encompasses two principal stages: (1) modularizing knowledge into shared and exclusive components, with compression to reduce redundancy and enhance efficiency; (2) dynamically merging shared and task-specific knowledge based on the input. This approach narrows the performance gap between merged and fine-tuned models and improves adaptability to heterogeneous data. Extensive experiments on $20$ datasets for both language and vision tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, showing an average improvement of $28.34\%$ in absolute normalized score for discriminative tasks and even surpassing the fine-tuned upper bound on the generative tasks. Our implementation is available in \url{https://github.com/LZY-the-boys/Twin-Merging}

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dynamic Model Merging Made Slim

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    DiDi-Merging achieves dynamic model merging performance matching or exceeding prior methods while using only 1.24x to 1.4x the parameters of a single fine-tuned model.

  2. Can Heterogeneous Language Models Be Fused?

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    HeteroFusion fuses heterogeneous LLMs via topology-based alignment and conflict-aware denoising, outperforming merging and ensemble baselines in cross-family and multi-source settings.

  3. Intrinsic Strain-Driven Topological Evolution in SrRuO3 via Flexural Strain Engineering

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    The abstract reports a 21% anomalous Hall conductivity increase in flexurally strained SrRuO3, but the submitted full text belongs to a different machine learning paper.

  4. Model Merging in LLMs, MLLMs, and Beyond: Methods, Theories, Applications and Opportunities

    cs.LG 2024-08 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper introduces a new taxonomy for model merging methods and reviews their applications in LLMs, MLLMs, continual learning, multi-task learning, and other subfields while outlining open challenges.

Pith tools