REVIEW 2 cited by
Anomaly Detection of Tabular Data Using LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown their potential in long-context understanding and mathematical reasoning. In this paper, we study the problem of using LLMs to detect tabular anomalies and show that pre-trained LLMs are zero-shot batch-level anomaly detectors. That is, without extra distribution-specific model fitting, they can discover hidden outliers in a batch of data, demonstrating their ability to identify low-density data regions. For LLMs that are not well aligned with anomaly detection and frequently output factual errors, we apply simple yet effective data-generating processes to simulate synthetic batch-level anomaly detection datasets and propose an end-to-end fine-tuning strategy to bring out the potential of LLMs in detecting real anomalies. Experiments on a large anomaly detection benchmark (ODDS) showcase i) GPT-4 has on-par performance with the state-of-the-art transductive learning-based anomaly detection methods and ii) the efficacy of our synthetic dataset and fine-tuning strategy in aligning LLMs to this task.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Text-ADBench: Text Anomaly Detection Benchmark based on LLMs Embedding
LLM embeddings improve text anomaly detection, shallow detectors match deep ones only under oracle embedding selection, and AUROC matrices are low-rank enough to support fast model evaluation.
-
From Alerts to Intelligence: A Novel LLM-Aided Framework for Host-based Intrusion Detection
SHIELD, an LLM-aided pipeline combining a masked autoencoder, deterministic data augmentation, and multi-level prompting, detects host-based attacks with high precision on three public datasets.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.