REVIEW 4 cited by
How Data Inter-connectivity Shapes LLMs Unlearning: A Structural Unlearning Perspective
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
While unlearning knowledge from large language models (LLMs) is receiving increasing attention, one important aspect remains unexplored. Existing approaches and benchmarks assume data points to-be-forgotten are independent, ignoring their inter-connectivity - a fundamental characteristic of real-world data structures. In this paper, we propose PISTOL, a method for compiling structural datasets. PISTOL leverages the inherently structured nature of contractual relationships, offering several key benefits. First, it enables insights into the impact of structural data on unlearning effectiveness. Second, it provides precise and concise ground truths for clearer evaluation. Third, its attribute generation does not require input from pre-trained LLMs, mitigating confounding risks. Leveraging datasets synthesized using PISTOL, we demonstrate how data inter-connectivity impacts LLM unlearning. Specifically, (a) in both the pre-trained and fine-tuned models, unlearning difficulty increases as data inter-connectivity grows, (b) there is a positive correlation between the density of the knowledge graph and unlearning difficulty, and (c) when the to-be-forgotten data is skewed towards one domain, balancing retaining performance across all domains is challenging.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Standard vs. Modular Sampling: Best Practices for Reliable LLM Unlearning
Entity-aligned sampling (MELU) is stabler than 1:1 or cyclic retain-set sampling for LLM unlearning, but the paper's diverse-neighbor claim is contradicted by its own Balanced results.
-
Editing as Unlearning: Are Knowledge Editing Methods Strong Baselines for Large Language Model Unlearning?
WISE and AlphaEdit, two knowledge editing methods, are competitive unlearning baselines when unlearning is framed as editing a model's answer into a refusal.
-
A Survey on Generative Model Unlearning: Fundamentals, Taxonomy, Evaluation, and Future Direction
A survey and framework that categorizes generative model unlearning by point-wise versus concept-wise objectives, parameter-based versus non-parametric methods, and completeness/utility/efficiency evaluation.
-
Lifting Data-Tracing Machine Unlearning to Knowledge-Tracing for Foundation Models
A position paper urging a shift from data-tracing to knowledge-tracing machine unlearning for foundation models, supported by a CLIP case study that shows current methods struggle to generalize.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.