Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CaLMQA: Exploring culturally specific long-form question answering across 23 languages

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.17761 v3 pith:TIIHF7IN submitted 2024-06-25 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords questionsculturallylanguagesanswerslong-formspecificacrosscalmqa
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite rising global usage of large language models (LLMs), their ability to generate long-form answers to culturally specific questions remains unexplored in many languages. To fill this gap, we perform the first study of textual multilingual long-form QA by creating CaLMQA, a dataset of 51.7K culturally specific questions across 23 different languages. We define culturally specific questions as those that refer to concepts unique to one or a few cultures, or have different answers depending on the cultural or regional context. We obtain these questions by crawling naturally-occurring questions from community web forums in high-resource languages, and by hiring native speakers to write questions in under-resourced, rarely-studied languages such as Fijian and Kirundi. Our data collection methodologies are translation-free, enabling the collection of culturally unique questions like "Kuber iki umwami wa mbere w'uburundi yitwa Ntare?" (Kirundi; English translation: "Why was the first king of Burundi called Ntare (Lion)?"). We evaluate factuality, relevance and surface-level quality of LLM-generated long-form answers, finding that (1) for many languages, even the best models make critical surface-level errors (e.g., answering in the wrong language, repetition), especially for low-resource languages; and (2) answers to culturally specific questions contain more factual errors than answers to culturally agnostic questions -- questions that have consistent meaning and answer across many cultures. We release CaLMQA to facilitate future research in cultural and multilingual long-form QA.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TyDi QA-WANA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Languages of West Asia and North Africa

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    TyDi QA-WANA is a new 28,000-example QA benchmark covering 10 under-represented languages with long-context, information-seeking questions and baseline evaluations.

Pith tools