Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Adversarial Search Engine Optimization for Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.18382 v2 pith:RLS42FSO submitted 2024-06-26 cs.CR cs.LG

Adversarial Search Engine Optimization for Large Language Models

classification cs.CR cs.LG
keywords attackscontentsearchattackerdemonstrateenginesincreasinglylanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in applications where the model selects from competing third-party content, such as in LLM-powered search engines or chatbot plugins. In this paper, we introduce Preference Manipulation Attacks, a new class of attacks that manipulate an LLM's selections to favor the attacker. We demonstrate that carefully crafted website content or plugin documentations can trick an LLM to promote the attacker products and discredit competitors, thereby increasing user traffic and monetization. We show this leads to a prisoner's dilemma, where all parties are incentivized to launch attacks, but the collective effect degrades the LLM's outputs for everyone. We demonstrate our attacks on production LLM search engines (Bing and Perplexity) and plugin APIs (for GPT-4 and Claude). As LLMs are increasingly used to rank third-party content, we expect Preference Manipulation Attacks to emerge as a significant threat.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Generative AI Advertising as a Problem of Trustworthy Commercial Intervention

    cs.CY 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Generative AI advertising is reframed as a problem of trustworthy commercial intervention on the generative process, with a taxonomy of influence tiers from product mentions to long-term preference shaping.

  2. Tug-of-War within A Decade: Conflict Resolution in Vulnerability Analysis via Teacher-Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generations

    cs.CL 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    CRVA-TGRAG combines parent-document segmentation, ensemble retrieval, and teacher-guided fine-tuning to mitigate knowledge conflicts and improve accuracy in LLM-based CVE vulnerability analysis.

  3. MaxShapley: Towards Incentive-compatible Generative Search with Fair Context Attribution

    cs.LG 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MaxShapley computes fair document attributions in generative QA by reducing Shapley value calculation to polynomial time via a max-sum utility, matching exact Shapley quality on HotPotQA, MuSiQUE, and MS MARCO while u...