REVIEW 2 cited by
From Local Concepts to Universals: Evaluating the Multicultural Understanding of Vision-Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Despite recent advancements in vision-language models, their performance remains suboptimal on images from non-western cultures due to underrepresentation in training datasets. Various benchmarks have been proposed to test models' cultural inclusivity, but they have limited coverage of cultures and do not adequately assess cultural diversity across universal as well as culture-specific local concepts. To address these limitations, we introduce the GlobalRG benchmark, comprising two challenging tasks: retrieval across universals and cultural visual grounding. The former task entails retrieving culturally diverse images for universal concepts from 50 countries, while the latter aims at grounding culture-specific concepts within images from 15 countries. Our evaluation across a wide range of models reveals that the performance varies significantly across cultures -- underscoring the necessity for enhancing multicultural understanding in vision-language models.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
RusCode: Russian Cultural Code Benchmark for Text-to-Image Generation
RusCode is a new 1,250-prompt Russian/English benchmark for cultural awareness in text-to-image models, with human evaluation showing Russian-trained models outperform general models.
-
CultureVLM: Characterizing and Improving Cultural Understanding of Vision-Language Models for over 100 Countries
CultureVerse is a 188-country, 19k-concept visual QA benchmark, and fine-tuning open VLMs on it improves cultural accuracy, but the main evaluation shares concepts between training and test sets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.