Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

MIA-Bench: Towards Better Instruction Following Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.01509 v5 pith:OVVJNLFF submitted 2024-07-01 cs.CV cs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.CL
keywords instructionsbenchmarkmodelsabilityevaluationinstructionmia-benchmllm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce MIA-Bench, a new benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on their ability to strictly adhere to complex instructions. Our benchmark comprises a diverse set of 400 image-prompt pairs, each crafted to challenge the models' compliance with layered instructions in generating accurate responses that satisfy specific requested patterns. Evaluation results from a wide array of state-of-the-art MLLMs reveal significant variations in performance, highlighting areas for improvement in instruction fidelity. Additionally, we create extra training data and explore supervised fine-tuning to enhance the models' ability to strictly follow instructions without compromising performance on other tasks. We hope this benchmark not only serves as a tool for measuring MLLM adherence to instructions, but also guides future developments in MLLM training methods.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Position: Reasoning After Perception Means Reasoning Without Vision

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Reasoning in text space cannot recover visual information that was collapsed during perception, so multimodal models need architectures that reason within the visual representation.

  2. BlueLM-2.5-3B Technical Report

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    BlueLM-2.5-3B is a small multimodal model with a switchable thinking mode that reportedly matches larger models like Qwen3-4B and comes close to Kimi-VL-A3B-16B on many benchmarks.

  3. HAIBU-ReMUD: Reasoning Multimodal Ultrasound Dataset and Model Bridging to General Specific Domains

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A pipeline that converts ultrasound textbooks and reports into 45,000 reasoning QA/VQA samples improves a 7B multimodal model on self-built ultrasound benchmarks.

Pith tools