REVIEW 4 cited by
Predicting vs. Acting: A Trade-off Between World Modeling & Agent Modeling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
RLHF-aligned LMs have shown unprecedented ability on both benchmarks and long-form text generation, yet they struggle with one foundational task: next-token prediction. As RLHF models become agent models aimed at interacting with humans, they seem to lose their world modeling -- the ability to predict what comes next in arbitrary documents, which is the foundational training objective of the Base LMs that RLHF adapts. Besides empirically demonstrating this trade-off, we propose a potential explanation: to perform coherent long-form generation, RLHF models restrict randomness via implicit blueprints. In particular, RLHF models concentrate probability on sets of anchor spans that co-occur across multiple generations for the same prompt, serving as textual scaffolding but also limiting a model's ability to generate documents that do not include these spans. We study this trade-off on the most effective current agent models, those aligned with RLHF, while exploring why this may remain a fundamental trade-off between models that act and those that predict, even as alignment techniques improve.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Safety from Honesty in a Disinterested AI Predictor
Under consequence-invariant posterior training and sparsity of coordinated harm patterns, the training mass on dangerous guarded Predictors is bounded by C_bad times R_shell.
-
Persistent Sparse Autoencoders: Learning Feature Timescales in Language Models
Persistent SAEs learn per-feature persistence coefficients from reconstruction, splitting features into fast local detectors and slow topic-tracking states that retain prompt-injection signals over long contexts.
-
BehaviorBox: Automated Discovery of Fine-Grained Performance Differences Between Language Models
A pipeline that combines contextual embeddings with two LMs' per-word probabilities and sparse autoencoders to automatically find interpretable slices where one model outperforms another.
-
Improved Representation Steering for Language Models
RePS, a reference-free bidirectional preference optimization objective, improves representation steering and suppression for Gemma models, outperforming language-modeling objectives and approaching prompting performance.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.