REVIEW 2 cited by
Self-Evaluation as a Defense Against Adversarial Attacks on LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We introduce a defense against adversarial attacks on LLMs utilizing self-evaluation. Our method requires no model fine-tuning, instead using pre-trained models to evaluate the inputs and outputs of a generator model, significantly reducing the cost of implementation in comparison to other, finetuning-based methods. Our method can significantly reduce the attack success rate of attacks on both open and closed-source LLMs, beyond the reductions demonstrated by Llama-Guard2 and commonly used content moderation APIs. We present an analysis of the effectiveness of our method, including attempts to attack the evaluator in various settings, demonstrating that it is also more resilient to attacks than existing methods. Code and data will be made available at https://github.com/Linlt-leon/self-eval.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SecurityLingua: Efficient Defense of LLM Jailbreak Attacks via Security-Aware Prompt Compression
A security-aware prompt compressor that reveals the hidden intent of jailbreak prompts and injects it into the system prompt reduces average attack success from 35% to 1% with negligible overhead.
-
To Protect the LLM Agent Against the Prompt Injection Attack with Polymorphic Prompt
Polymorphic Prompt Assembling randomizes per-request system-prompt separators, cutting prompt-injection attack success to as low as 1.83% on GPT-3.5 with 0.06 ms runtime overhead.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.