Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

LLM Internal States Reveal Hallucination Risk Faced With a Query

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.03282 v2 pith:OFN3IQNG submitted 2024-07-03 cs.CL

LLM Internal States Reveal Hallucination Risk Faced With a Query

classification cs.CL
keywords hallucinationinternalllmsqueryriskstatesdatafaced
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The hallucination problem of Large Language Models (LLMs) significantly limits their reliability and trustworthiness. Humans have a self-awareness process that allows us to recognize what we don't know when faced with queries. Inspired by this, our paper investigates whether LLMs can estimate their own hallucination risk before response generation. We analyze the internal mechanisms of LLMs broadly both in terms of training data sources and across 15 diverse Natural Language Generation (NLG) tasks, spanning over 700 datasets. Our empirical analysis reveals two key insights: (1) LLM internal states indicate whether they have seen the query in training data or not; and (2) LLM internal states show they are likely to hallucinate or not regarding the query. Our study explores particular neurons, activation layers, and tokens that play a crucial role in the LLM perception of uncertainty and hallucination risk. By a probing estimator, we leverage LLM self-assessment, achieving an average hallucination estimation accuracy of 84.32\% at run time.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Prompt Compression via Activation Aggregation

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A learned weighted sum of intermediate-layer activations compresses an instruction prompt into a single patch vector that, injected at an early layer, recovers task accuracy within ~2% of the full prompt.

  2. Grad Detect: Gradient-Based Hallucination Detection in LLMs

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Grad Detect uses internal gradient patterns from one inference pass to predict LLM hallucinations and abstention, outperforming confidence and sampling baselines on Q&A benchmarks with most signal in the final five layers.

  3. LLM Self-Recognition: Steering and Retrieving Activation Signatures

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Steering LLM residual streams with random sparse vectors creates detectable self-recognition fingerprints that enable over 98% accurate attribution of generated text to specific models without degrading output quality.

  4. Exposing the Ghost in the Transformer: Abnormal Detection for Large Language Models via Hidden State Forensics

    cs.CR 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A framework detects LLM anomalies including hallucinations, jailbreaks, and backdoors by forensic inspection of layer-wise hidden state patterns, reporting over 95% accuracy with minimal computational overhead.