Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Solving for X and Beyond: Can Large Language Models Solve Complex Math Problems with More-Than-Two Unknowns?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.05134 v1 pith:CURSZJIN submitted 2024-07-06 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords problemsunknownsbeyondxperformancechallengesllmsmathnumber
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in solving math problems, a hallmark of human intelligence. Despite high success rates on current benchmarks; however, these often feature simple problems with only one or two unknowns, which do not sufficiently challenge their reasoning capacities. This paper introduces a novel benchmark, BeyondX, designed to address these limitations by incorporating problems with multiple unknowns. Recognizing the challenges in proposing multi-unknown problems from scratch, we developed BeyondX using an innovative automated pipeline that progressively increases complexity by expanding the number of unknowns in simpler problems. Empirical study on BeyondX reveals that the performance of existing LLMs, even those fine-tuned specifically on math tasks, significantly decreases as the number of unknowns increases - with a performance drop of up to 70\% observed in GPT-4. To tackle these challenges, we propose the Formulate-and-Solve strategy, a generalized prompting approach that effectively handles problems with an arbitrary number of unknowns. Our findings reveal that this strategy not only enhances LLM performance on the BeyondX benchmark but also provides deeper insights into the computational limits of LLMs when faced with more complex mathematical challenges.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models: Assessing Logical and Arithmetic Errors across Wide Numerical Ranges

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs' logical reasoning errors increase by up to 14 percentage points when math word problems use unusually large numbers, and arithmetic errors are worse inside word problems than standalone.

  2. Policy Guided Tree Search for Enhanced LLM Reasoning

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    PGTS trains a graph-transformer policy via PPO to guide tree search over LLM reasoning steps, reporting improved accuracy and lower token use than chain-of-thought and MCTS baselines.

Pith tools