Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Disrupting Diffusion-based Inpainters with Semantic Digression

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.10277 v1 pith:NEPVO65H submitted 2024-07-14 cs.CV cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.LG
keywords disruptiondiffusionhiddendigressionframeworkinpaintingoptimizationapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The fabrication of visual misinformation on the web and social media has increased exponentially with the advent of foundational text-to-image diffusion models. Namely, Stable Diffusion inpainters allow the synthesis of maliciously inpainted images of personal and private figures, and copyrighted contents, also known as deepfakes. To combat such generations, a disruption framework, namely Photoguard, has been proposed, where it adds adversarial noise to the context image to disrupt their inpainting synthesis. While their framework suggested a diffusion-friendly approach, the disruption is not sufficiently strong and it requires a significant amount of GPU and time to immunize the context image. In our work, we re-examine both the minimal and favorable conditions for a successful inpainting disruption, proposing DDD, a "Digression guided Diffusion Disruption" framework. First, we identify the most adversarially vulnerable diffusion timestep range with respect to the hidden space. Within this scope of noised manifold, we pose the problem as a semantic digression optimization. We maximize the distance between the inpainting instance's hidden states and a semantic-aware hidden state centroid, calibrated both by Monte Carlo sampling of hidden states and a discretely projected optimization in the token space. Effectively, our approach achieves stronger disruption and a higher success rate than Photoguard while lowering the GPU memory requirement, and speeding the optimization up to three times faster.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Structure Disruption: Subverting Malicious Diffusion-Based Inpainting via Self-Attention Query Perturbation

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    SDA adds a small perturbation that disrupts self-attention queries in the first denoising step, stopping Stable Diffusion inpainting from producing coherent edits.

Pith tools