Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

NTSEBENCH: Cognitive Reasoning Benchmark for Vision Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.10380 v3 pith:5OXNGSZG submitted 2024-07-15 cs.CV cs.AIcs.CLcs.IR

classification cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.IR
keywords reasoningcognitivedatasetmodelsdesigneddifferentevaluateimages
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Cognitive textual and visual reasoning tasks, including puzzles, series, and analogies, demand the ability to quickly reason, decipher, and evaluate patterns both textually and spatially. Due to extensive training on vast amounts of human-curated data, LLMs and VLMs excel in common-sense reasoning tasks, however still struggle with more complex reasoning that demands deeper cognitive understanding. We introduce NTSEBench, a new dataset designed to evaluate cognitive multi-modal reasoning and problem-solving skills of large models. The dataset contains 2728 multiple-choice questions, accompanied by a total of 4,642 images, categorized into 26 different types. These questions are drawn from the nationwide NTSE examination in India and feature a mix of visual and textual general aptitude challenges, designed to assess intelligence and critical thinking skills beyond mere rote learning. We establish baselines on the dataset using state-of-the-art LLMs and VLMs. To facilitate a comparison between open source and propriety models, we propose four distinct modeling strategies to handle different modalities -- text and images -- in the dataset instances.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. COREVQA: A Crowd Observation and Reasoning Entailment Visual Question Answering Benchmark

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    COREVQA introduces a 5,608-pair true/false visual entailment benchmark for crowd images on which the strongest tested vision-language models reach only 77.57% accuracy.

Pith tools