Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Panza: Design and Analysis of a Fully-Local Personalized Text Writing Assistant

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.10994 v4 pith:NDWOAGOW submitted 2024-06-24 cs.CL cs.AIcs.HCcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.HCcs.LG
keywords writingmodelsdataemailpanzastyleassistantimitate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The availability of powerful open-source large language models (LLMs) opens exciting use-cases, such as using personal data to fine-tune these models to imitate a user's unique writing style. Two key requirements for such assistants are personalization - in the sense that the assistant should recognizably reflect the user's own writing style - and privacy - users may justifiably be wary of uploading extremely personal data, such as their email archive, to a third-party service. In this paper, we present a new design and evaluation for such an automated assistant, for the specific use case of email generation, which we call Panza. Panza's personalization features are based on a combination of fine-tuning using a variant of the Reverse Instructions technique together with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). We demonstrate that this combination allows us to fine-tune an LLM to reflect a user's writing style using limited data, while executing on extremely limited resources, e.g. on a free Google Colab instance. Our key methodological contribution is the first detailed study of evaluation metrics for this personalized writing task, and of how different choices of system components--the use of RAG and of different fine-tuning approaches-impact the system's performance. Additionally, we demonstrate that very little data - under 100 email samples - are sufficient to create models that convincingly imitate humans. This finding showcases a previously-unknown attack vector in language models - that access to a small number of writing samples can allow a bad actor to cheaply create generative models that imitate a target's writing style. We are releasing the full Panza code as well as three new email datasets licensed for research use at https://github.com/IST-DASLab/PanzaMail.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Small Is Enough: Per-User Style Rewriting of AI-Edited Text via LoRA Adapters

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LoRA-adapted 0.5B-7B language models all reach the same automatic rewriting score (0.69), indicating model size does not change measured quality for this single-user style-rewriting task.

Pith tools