REVIEW 3 cited by
DLO: Dynamic Layer Operation for Efficient Vertical Scaling of LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this paper, we introduce Dynamic Layer Operations (DLO), a novel approach for vertically scaling transformer-based Large Language Models (LLMs) by dynamically expanding, activating, or skipping layers using a sophisticated routing policy based on layerwise feature similarity. Unlike traditional Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) methods that focus on extending the model width, our approach targets model depth, addressing the redundancy observed across layer representations for various input samples. Our framework is integrated with the Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) stage, eliminating the need for resource-intensive Continual Pre-Training (CPT). Experimental results demonstrate that DLO not only outperforms the original unscaled models but also achieves comparable results to densely expanded models with significantly improved efficiency. Our work offers a promising direction for building efficient yet powerful LLMs. We will release our implementation and model weights upon acceptance.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Scaling depth capacity via zero/one-layer model expansion
Training GPT2 from a zero/one-layer model and expanding depth at 80% of the schedule reaches fixed-size loss with approximately 5x less compute.
-
Crown, Frame, Reverse: Layer-Wise Scaling Variants for LLM Pre-Training
At 180M parameters and 5B tokens, all layer-wise scaling variants beat the paper's 18-layer uniform baseline, yet the 12-layer uniform baseline remains best.
-
ChameleonLLM: Batch-Aware Dynamic Low-Rank Adaptation via Inference-Time Clusters
ChameleonLLM generates low-rank LoRA updates from clustered batch statistics via a hypernetwork, claiming better perplexity than static LoRA, but the evidence is undercut by implausible baselines and confounded comparisons.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.