Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

CVE-LLM : Automatic vulnerability evaluation in medical device industry using large language models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.14640 v1 pith:DAFPONAD submitted 2024-07-19 cs.CL cs.AIcs.CR

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.CR
keywords vulnerabilitylanguageassessmentindustrymedicalmodelsvulnerabilitiesautomatic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The healthcare industry is currently experiencing an unprecedented wave of cybersecurity attacks, impacting millions of individuals. With the discovery of thousands of vulnerabilities each month, there is a pressing need to drive the automation of vulnerability assessment processes for medical devices, facilitating rapid mitigation efforts. Generative AI systems have revolutionized various industries, offering unparalleled opportunities for automation and increased efficiency. This paper presents a solution leveraging Large Language Models (LLMs) to learn from historical evaluations of vulnerabilities for the automatic assessment of vulnerabilities in the medical devices industry. This approach is applied within the portfolio of a single manufacturer, taking into account device characteristics, including existing security posture and controls. The primary contributions of this paper are threefold. Firstly, it provides a detailed examination of the best practices for training a vulnerability Language Model (LM) in an industrial context. Secondly, it presents a comprehensive comparison and insightful analysis of the effectiveness of Language Models in vulnerability assessment. Finally, it proposes a new human-in-the-loop framework to expedite vulnerability evaluation processes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLMs in Software Security: A Survey of Vulnerability Detection Techniques and Insights

    cs.CR 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey of LLM-based vulnerability detection covering 58 papers, with a taxonomy, dataset overview, and gap analysis, but limited by non-transparent selection and unsupported quantitative claims.

Pith tools