Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Sentiment Reasoning for Healthcare

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.21054 v5 pith:45OFM4IA submitted 2024-07-24 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LGcs.SDeess.AS

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGcs.SDeess.AS
keywords sentimentreasoningmodeltranscriptsanalysishealthcarehumanlabel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Transparency in AI healthcare decision-making is crucial. By incorporating rationales to explain reason for each predicted label, users could understand Large Language Models (LLMs)'s reasoning to make better decision. In this work, we introduce a new task - Sentiment Reasoning - for both speech and text modalities, and our proposed multimodal multitask framework and the world's largest multimodal sentiment analysis dataset. Sentiment Reasoning is an auxiliary task in sentiment analysis where the model predicts both the sentiment label and generates the rationale behind it based on the input transcript. Our study conducted on both human transcripts and Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) transcripts shows that Sentiment Reasoning helps improve model transparency by providing rationale for model prediction with quality semantically comparable to humans while also improving model's classification performance (+2% increase in both accuracy and macro-F1) via rationale-augmented fine-tuning. Also, no significant difference in the semantic quality of generated rationales between human and ASR transcripts. All code, data (five languages - Vietnamese, English, Chinese, German, and French) and models are published online: https://github.com/leduckhai/Sentiment-Reasoning

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AI in Mental Health: Emotional and Sentiment Analysis of Large Language Models' Responses to Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Queries

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Eight LLMs show measurably different emotional tones in mental-health answers: anxiety prompts produced near-saturated fear scores, depression prompts the most sadness, and stress prompts the most optimism.

Pith tools