Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Convergence rates for the Adam optimizer

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.21078 v1 pith:GARCZZV3 submitted 2024-07-29 math.OC cs.LGmath.PRstat.ML

classification math.OCcs.LGmath.PRstat.ML
keywords adamoptimizationfunctionoptimizerconvergencestochasticfieldobjective
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) optimization methods are nowadays the method of choice for the training of deep neural networks (DNNs) in artificial intelligence systems. In practically relevant training problems, usually not the plain vanilla standard SGD method is the employed optimization scheme but instead suitably accelerated and adaptive SGD optimization methods are applied. As of today, maybe the most popular variant of such accelerated and adaptive SGD optimization methods is the famous Adam optimizer proposed by Kingma & Ba in 2014. Despite the popularity of the Adam optimizer in implementations, it remained an open problem of research to provide a convergence analysis for the Adam optimizer even in the situation of simple quadratic stochastic optimization problems where the objective function (the function one intends to minimize) is strongly convex. In this work we solve this problem by establishing optimal convergence rates for the Adam optimizer for a large class of stochastic optimization problems, in particular, covering simple quadratic stochastic optimization problems. The key ingredient of our convergence analysis is a new vector field function which we propose to refer to as the Adam vector field. This Adam vector field accurately describes the macroscopic behaviour of the Adam optimization process but differs from the negative gradient of the objective function (the function we intend to minimize) of the considered stochastic optimization problem. In particular, our convergence analysis reveals that the Adam optimizer does typically not converge to critical points of the objective function (zeros of the gradient of the objective function) of the considered optimization problem but converges with rates to zeros of this Adam vector field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unified convergence analysis for gradient descent optimization methods in the training of deep neural networks

    math.OC 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Bounded trajectories of a broad class of GD optimizers (Adam, RMSprop, NAG, Adan, etc.) converge with polynomial rates to critical points of KL objectives with locally Lipschitz gradients, covering analytic-activation...

  2. PADAM: Parallel averaged Adam reduces the error for stochastic optimization in scientific machine learning

    math.OC 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    PADAM runs K differently averaged Adam trajectories in parallel, selects the one with the smallest test error, and achieves the best optimization error in nearly all of 13 tested scientific machine learning problems w...

Pith tools