REVIEW 3 cited by
Deep Learning based Visually Rich Document Content Understanding: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Deep Learning based Visually Rich Document Content Understanding: A Survey
read the original abstract
Visually Rich Documents (VRDs) play a vital role in domains such as academia, finance, healthcare, and marketing, as they convey information through a combination of text, layout, and visual elements. Traditional approaches to extracting information from VRDs rely heavily on expert knowledge and manual annotation, making them labor-intensive and inefficient. Recent advances in deep learning have transformed this landscape by enabling multimodal models that integrate vision, language, and layout features through pretraining, significantly improving information extraction performance. This survey presents a comprehensive overview of deep learning-based frameworks for VRD Content Understanding (VRD-CU). We categorize existing methods based on their modeling strategies and downstream tasks, and provide a comparative analysis of key components, including feature representation, fusion techniques, model architectures, and pretraining objectives. Additionally, we highlight the strengths and limitations of each approach and discuss their suitability for different applications. The paper concludes with a discussion of current challenges and emerging trends, offering guidance for future research and practical deployment in real-world scenarios.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
DocOCR-Eval: A Correction-Based Framework for OCR Tool Selection Without Ground Truth
OCR tools can be ranked without ground-truth labels by measuring how much a multimodal LLM must correct each tool's output.
-
Multi-Modal Vision vs. Text-Based Parsing: Benchmarking LLM Strategies for Invoice Processing
Across three invoice datasets, multimodal LLMs extract fields more accurately from raw images than from markdown converted by a parsing tool, with Gemini 2.5 Pro leading.
-
A Survey on MLLM-based Visually Rich Document Understanding: Methods, Challenges, and Emerging Trends
A survey of MLLM-based Visually Rich Document Understanding covering feature integration techniques, training paradigms, challenges like data scarcity, and emerging trends such as RAG and agentic frameworks.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.