REVIEW 4 cited by
Swiss Cheese Model for AI Safety: A Taxonomy and Reference Architecture for Multi-Layered Guardrails of Foundation Model Based Agents
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Foundation Model (FM)-based agents are revolutionizing application development across various domains. However, their rapidly growing capabilities and autonomy have raised significant concerns about AI safety. Researchers are exploring better ways to design guardrails to ensure that the runtime behavior of FM-based agents remains within specific boundaries. Nevertheless, designing effective runtime guardrails is challenging due to the agents' autonomous and non-deterministic behavior. The involvement of multiple pipeline stages and agent artifacts, such as goals, plans, tools, at runtime further complicates these issues. Addressing these challenges at runtime requires multi-layered guardrails that operate effectively at various levels of the agent architecture. Therefore, in this paper, based on the results of a systematic literature review, we present a comprehensive taxonomy of runtime guardrails for FM-based agents to identify the key quality attributes for guardrails and design dimensions. Inspired by the Swiss Cheese Model, we also propose a reference architecture for designing multi-layered runtime guardrails for FM-based agents, which includes three dimensions: quality attributes, pipelines, and artifacts. The proposed taxonomy and reference architecture provide concrete and robust guidance for researchers and practitioners to build AI-safety-by-design from a software architecture perspective.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Governed Capability Evolution: Lifecycle-Time Compatibility Checking and Rollback for AI-Component-Based Systems, with Embodied Agents as Case Study
A governed upgrade framework with interface, policy, behavioral, and recovery checks keeps unsafe activations at zero across multi-round AI capability upgrades on a PyBullet/ROS 2 manipulation testbed while retaining ...
-
AutoSpec: Safety Rule Evolution for LLM Agents via Inductive Logic Programming
ILP-guided CEGIS evolves deployed expert safety rules for LLM agents from annotated traces, raising F1 to 0.98 (code) and 0.93 (embodied) in 4–5 iterations.
-
Software Architecture Meets LLMs: A Systematic Literature Review
A systematic review of 18 studies finds LLMs are increasingly used for software architecture tasks, mostly via zero-shot prompting, with one-third of studies lacking baseline comparisons.
-
RAGOps: Operating and Managing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Pipelines
RAGOps frames RAG operations as the intertwined management of a query processing pipeline and a data lifecycle, with design considerations, challenges, and two anecdotal use cases.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.