Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Swiss Cheese Model for AI Safety: A Taxonomy and Reference Architecture for Multi-Layered Guardrails of Foundation Model Based Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.02205 v4 pith:ZVYK76QB submitted 2024-08-05 cs.SE cs.AI

classification cs.SEcs.AI
keywords guardrailsagentsruntimearchitecturemodelfm-basedmulti-layeredreference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Foundation Model (FM)-based agents are revolutionizing application development across various domains. However, their rapidly growing capabilities and autonomy have raised significant concerns about AI safety. Researchers are exploring better ways to design guardrails to ensure that the runtime behavior of FM-based agents remains within specific boundaries. Nevertheless, designing effective runtime guardrails is challenging due to the agents' autonomous and non-deterministic behavior. The involvement of multiple pipeline stages and agent artifacts, such as goals, plans, tools, at runtime further complicates these issues. Addressing these challenges at runtime requires multi-layered guardrails that operate effectively at various levels of the agent architecture. Therefore, in this paper, based on the results of a systematic literature review, we present a comprehensive taxonomy of runtime guardrails for FM-based agents to identify the key quality attributes for guardrails and design dimensions. Inspired by the Swiss Cheese Model, we also propose a reference architecture for designing multi-layered runtime guardrails for FM-based agents, which includes three dimensions: quality attributes, pipelines, and artifacts. The proposed taxonomy and reference architecture provide concrete and robust guidance for researchers and practitioners to build AI-safety-by-design from a software architecture perspective.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Governed Capability Evolution: Lifecycle-Time Compatibility Checking and Rollback for AI-Component-Based Systems, with Embodied Agents as Case Study

    cs.RO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    A governed upgrade framework with interface, policy, behavioral, and recovery checks keeps unsafe activations at zero across multi-round AI capability upgrades on a PyBullet/ROS 2 manipulation testbed while retaining ...

  2. AutoSpec: Safety Rule Evolution for LLM Agents via Inductive Logic Programming

    cs.SE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    ILP-guided CEGIS evolves deployed expert safety rules for LLM agents from annotated traces, raising F1 to 0.98 (code) and 0.93 (embodied) in 4–5 iterations.

  3. Software Architecture Meets LLMs: A Systematic Literature Review

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A systematic review of 18 studies finds LLMs are increasingly used for software architecture tasks, mostly via zero-shot prompting, with one-third of studies lacking baseline comparisons.

  4. RAGOps: Operating and Managing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Pipelines

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    RAGOps frames RAG operations as the intertwined management of a query processing pipeline and a data lifecycle, with design considerations, challenges, and two anecdotal use cases.

Pith tools