Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Benchmarking the Capabilities of Large Language Models in Transportation System Engineering: Accuracy, Consistency, and Reasoning Behaviors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.08302 v1 pith:YHKPGXLY submitted 2024-08-15 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords transportationengineeringproblemsaccuracybehaviorscapabilitiesclaudesolving
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we explore the capabilities of state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4, GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Claude 3 Opus, Gemini 1.5 Pro, Llama 3, and Llama 3.1 in solving some selected undergraduate-level transportation engineering problems. We introduce TransportBench, a benchmark dataset that includes a sample of transportation engineering problems on a wide range of subjects in the context of planning, design, management, and control of transportation systems. This dataset is used by human experts to evaluate the capabilities of various commercial and open-sourced LLMs, especially their accuracy, consistency, and reasoning behaviors, in solving transportation engineering problems. Our comprehensive analysis uncovers the unique strengths and limitations of each LLM, e.g. our analysis shows the impressive accuracy and some unexpected inconsistent behaviors of Claude 3.5 Sonnet in solving TransportBench problems. Our study marks a thrilling first step toward harnessing artificial general intelligence for complex transportation challenges.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CAMB: A comprehensive industrial LLM benchmark on civil aviation maintenance

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CAMB provides a seven-task, eight-dataset benchmark for assessing LLM and embedding model performance in civil aviation maintenance, with initial results showing large models top out near 69% on domain multiple-choice...

Pith tools