Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Spectrum Sharing Between Low Earth Orbit Satellite and Terrestrial Networks: A Stochastic Geometry Perspective Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.12145 v1 pith:XMF77CVS submitted 2024-08-22 eess.SP

Spectrum Sharing Between Low Earth Orbit Satellite and Terrestrial Networks: A Stochastic Geometry Perspective Analysis

classification eess.SP
keywords networksterrestrialsatellitespectrumsharinganalysisexpressionsusers
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite networks with mega constellations have the potential to provide 5G and beyond services ubiquitously. However, these networks may introduce mutual interference to both satellite and terrestrial networks, particularly when sharing spectrum resources. In this paper, we present a system-level performance analysis to address these interference issues using the tool of stochastic geometry. We model the spatial distributions of satellites, satellite users, terrestrial base stations (BSs), and terrestrial users using independent Poisson point processes on the surfaces of concentric spheres. Under these spatial models, we derive analytical expressions for the ergodic spectral efficiency of uplink (UL) and downlink (DL) satellite networks when they share spectrum with both UL and DL terrestrial networks. These derived ergodic expressions capture comprehensive network parameters, including the densities of satellite and terrestrial networks, the path-loss exponent, and fading. From our analysis, we determine the conditions under which spectrum sharing with UL terrestrial networks is advantageous for both UL and DL satellite networks. Our key finding is that the optimal spectrum sharing configuration among the four possible configurations depends on the density ratio between terrestrial BSs and users, providing a design guideline for spectrum management. Simulation results confirm the accuracy of our derived expressions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Stochastic Analysis of Successive Interference Cancellation in a Narrow-Beam LEO Uplink

    eess.SP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    SIC lets a narrow-beam LEO uplink serve three effective UEs per cell with finite SIR variance and only a 0.2 bit/s/Hz throughput penalty versus single-user service.

  2. Sharing is Caring: Analysis of Hybrid Network Sharing Strategies for Energy Efficient Multi-Operator Cellular Systems

    cs.NI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0

    Using stochastic geometry and Paris operator traffic, the paper estimates that full network sharing between two mobile operators can save up to about 35 percent of base station energy while meeting QoS targets.

  3. Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface-Enhanced Satellite Networks: Deployment Strategies, Key Capabilities, Practical Solutions, and Future Directions

    eess.SP 2025-12 conditional novelty 4.0

    A deployment-first survey of RIS in satellite networks, with a rule-of-thumb linking RIS aperture to the radius over which virtual-LoS links beat direct LoS.