REVIEW 3 cited by
Assessing Modality Bias in Video Question Answering Benchmarks with Multimodal Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can simultaneously process visual, textual, and auditory data, capturing insights that complement human analysis. However, existing video question-answering (VidQA) benchmarks and datasets often exhibit a bias toward a single modality, despite the goal of requiring advanced reasoning skills that integrate diverse modalities to answer the queries. In this work, we introduce the modality importance score (MIS) to identify such bias. It is designed to assess which modality embeds the necessary information to answer the question. Additionally, we propose an innovative method using state-of-the-art MLLMs to estimate the modality importance, which can serve as a proxy for human judgments of modality perception. With this MIS, we demonstrate the presence of unimodal bias and the scarcity of genuinely multimodal questions in existing datasets. We further validate the modality importance score with multiple ablation studies to evaluate the performance of MLLMs on permuted feature sets. Our results indicate that current models do not effectively integrate information due to modality imbalance in existing datasets. Our proposed MLLM-derived MIS can guide the curation of modality-balanced datasets that advance multimodal learning and enhance MLLMs' capabilities to understand and utilize synergistic relations across modalities.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Overview of the NLPCC 2026 Shared Task 1: Difficulty-Aware Multilingual and Multimodal Medical Instructional Video Understanding Evaluation
DA-MIVQA is a new medical video QA benchmark that labels questions by evidence type, but the paper's own results omit the crucial difficulty-split analysis.
-
Uncertainty-Weighted Image-Event Multimodal Fusion for Video Anomaly Detection
IEF-VAD fuses CLIP image and synthetic-event features via learned inverse-variance weighting with Kalman-style updates and iterative refinement, reporting state-of-the-art AUC/AP on UCF-Crime, XD-Violence, ShanghaiTec...
-
Enhanced Multimodal RAG-LLM for Accurate Visual Question Answering
A pipeline that converts an image into a scene graph, embeds the graph chunks, retrieves the most relevant chunks, and prompts an LLM with them reports high VQA accuracy, but the comparison to MLLMs is not credible.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.