Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

How Diffusion Models Learn to Factorize and Compose

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.13256 v2 pith:4RB5CNWT submitted 2024-08-23 cs.AI cs.CVcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CVcs.LG
keywords modelsdiffusioncompositionalityfactorizedlearnrepresentationsabilitycompositional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Diffusion models are capable of generating photo-realistic images that combine elements which likely do not appear together in the training set, demonstrating the ability to \textit{compositionally generalize}. Nonetheless, the precise mechanism of compositionality and how it is acquired through training remains elusive. Inspired by cognitive neuroscientific approaches, we consider a highly reduced setting to examine whether and when diffusion models learn semantically meaningful and factorized representations of composable features. We performed extensive controlled experiments on conditional Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPMs) trained to generate various forms of 2D Gaussian bump images. We found that the models learn factorized but not fully continuous manifold representations for encoding continuous features of variation underlying the data. With such representations, models demonstrate superior feature compositionality but limited ability to interpolate over unseen values of a given feature. Our experimental results further demonstrate that diffusion models can attain compositionality with few compositional examples, suggesting a more efficient way to train DDPMs. Finally, we connect manifold formation in diffusion models to percolation theory in physics, offering insight into the sudden onset of factorized representation learning. Our thorough toy experiments thus contribute a deeper understanding of how diffusion models capture compositional structure in data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Position: A Theory of Deep Learning Must Include Compositional Sparsity

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    All polynomial-time computable functions are compositionally sparse, and this property is the proposed reason deep networks avoid the curse of dimensionality and achieve practical success.

Pith tools