REVIEW 2 cited by
Inductive Learning of Logical Theories with LLMs: An Expressivity-Graded Analysis
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This work presents a novel systematic methodology to analyse the capabilities and limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs) with feedback from a formal inference engine, on logic theory induction. The analysis is complexity-graded w.r.t. rule dependency structure, allowing quantification of specific inference challenges on LLM performance. Integrating LLMs with formal methods is a promising frontier in the Natural Language Processing field, as an important avenue for improving model inference control and explainability. In particular, inductive learning over complex sets of facts and rules, poses unique challenges for current autoregressive models, as they lack explicit symbolic grounding. While they can be complemented by formal systems, the properties delivered by LLMs regarding inductive learning, are not well understood and quantified. Empirical results indicate that the largest LLMs can achieve competitive results against a SOTA Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) system baseline, but also that tracking long predicate relationship chains is a more difficult obstacle than theory complexity for LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Faithful and Robust LLM-Driven Theorem Proving for NLI Explanations
The proposed Faithful-Refiner, combining syntactic parsing, quantifier and consistency checks, logical-relation guidance, and detailed proof feedback, raises explanation refinement rates on three NLI benchmarks by lar...
-
Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models: A Survey
A survey of logical reasoning in large language models that organizes benchmarks, evaluations, and enhancement methods around formal and symbolic logic.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.