REVIEW 5 cited by
MaFeRw: Query Rewriting with Multi-Aspect Feedbacks for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
MaFeRw: Query Rewriting with Multi-Aspect Feedbacks for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
read the original abstract
In a real-world RAG system, the current query often involves spoken ellipses and ambiguous references from dialogue contexts, necessitating query rewriting to better describe user's information needs. However, traditional context-based rewriting has minimal enhancement on downstream generation tasks due to the lengthy process from query rewriting to response generation. Some researchers try to utilize reinforcement learning with generation feedback to assist the rewriter, but these sparse rewards provide little guidance in most cases, leading to unstable training and generation results. We find that user's needs are also reflected in the gold document, retrieved documents and ground truth. Therefore, by feeding back these multi-aspect dense rewards to query rewriting, more stable and satisfactory responses can be achieved. In this paper, we propose a novel query rewriting method MaFeRw, which improves RAG performance by integrating multi-aspect feedback from both the retrieval process and generated results. Specifically, we first use manual data to train a T5 model for the rewriter initialization. Next, we design three metrics as reinforcement learning feedback: the similarity between the rewritten query and the gold document, the ranking metrics, and ROUGE between the generation and the ground truth. Inspired by RLAIF, we train three kinds of reward models for the above metrics to achieve more efficient training. Finally, we combine the scores of these reward models as feedback, and use PPO algorithm to explore the optimal query rewriting strategy. Experimental results on two conversational RAG datasets demonstrate that MaFeRw achieves superior generation metrics and more stable training compared to baselines.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Do We Still Need GraphRAG? Benchmarking RAG and GraphRAG for Agentic Search Systems
Agentic search narrows the gap between dense RAG and GraphRAG but does not remove GraphRAG's advantage on complex multi-hop reasoning.
-
$S^3$-R1: Learning to Retrieve and Answer Step-by-Step with Synthetic Data
S^3-R1 generates synthetic intermediate-difficulty multi-hop questions and applies dense rewards for search quality plus answer correctness, yielding up to 10% better out-of-domain generalization than baselines.
-
Learning User-Aware Recall: Personalized Retrieval in Long-Term Conversational Memory
PPRO adds user-profile-guided ranking and retrieval-oriented query rewriting to memory-augmented LLMs, yielding gains on LoCoMo and LongMemEval-S over prior memory systems.
-
Learning User-Aware Recall: Personalized Retrieval in Long-Term Conversational Memory
PPRO improves user-aware memory retrieval in conversational agents by using derived user profiles for ranking and training a query rewriter via Group Relative Policy Optimization, with reported gains on LoCoMo and Lon...
-
$S^3$-R1: Learning to Retrieve and Answer Step-by-Step with Synthetic Data
S^3-R1 generates synthetic multi-hop questions and uses combined intermediate and final rewards to train RL models for retrieval and answering, reporting up to 10% better out-of-domain generalization.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.