Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

ProteinBench: A Holistic Evaluation of Protein Foundation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.06744 v2 pith:VG6EZGEL submitted 2024-09-10 q-bio.QM cs.AIcs.LGq-bio.BM

ProteinBench: A Holistic Evaluation of Protein Foundation Models

classification q-bio.QM cs.AIcs.LGq-bio.BM
keywords proteinevaluationmodelsfoundationframeworkholisticperformanceproteinbench
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent years have witnessed a surge in the development of protein foundation models, significantly improving performance in protein prediction and generative tasks ranging from 3D structure prediction and protein design to conformational dynamics. However, the capabilities and limitations associated with these models remain poorly understood due to the absence of a unified evaluation framework. To fill this gap, we introduce ProteinBench, a holistic evaluation framework designed to enhance the transparency of protein foundation models. Our approach consists of three key components: (i) A taxonomic classification of tasks that broadly encompass the main challenges in the protein domain, based on the relationships between different protein modalities; (ii) A multi-metric evaluation approach that assesses performance across four key dimensions: quality, novelty, diversity, and robustness; and (iii) In-depth analyses from various user objectives, providing a holistic view of model performance. Our comprehensive evaluation of protein foundation models reveals several key findings that shed light on their current capabilities and limitations. To promote transparency and facilitate further research, we release the evaluation dataset, code, and a public leaderboard publicly for further analysis and a general modular toolkit. We intend for ProteinBench to be a living benchmark for establishing a standardized, in-depth evaluation framework for protein foundation models, driving their development and application while fostering collaboration within the field.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. VibeProteinBench: An Evaluation Benchmark for Language-interfaced Vibe Protein Design

    q-bio.QM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    VibeProteinBench is a three-stage language-interfaced benchmark revealing that no current LLM performs strongly across recognition, engineering, and generation of proteins.

  2. VibeProteinBench: An Evaluation Benchmark for Language-interfaced Vibe Protein Design

    q-bio.QM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    VibeProteinBench is a new benchmark evaluating LLMs on open-ended language-interfaced protein design across recognition, engineering, and generation, with no model showing strong performance in all areas.

  3. Proteo-R1: Reasoning Foundation Models for De Novo Protein Design

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Proteo-R1 decouples an MLLM-based understanding expert that selects functional residues from a diffusion-based generation expert that builds protein structures under those explicit constraints.

  4. Antigen-specific Antibody Multi-modal Foundation Model for Functional Antibody Design

    q-bio.BM 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0

    AAMFM combines ESM3, an antigen-geometry adapter, and Cal-DPO preference optimization rewarded by AlphaFold3-style scores to design antibody CDRs and structures, reporting higher predicted binding scores than prior methods.