REVIEW 2 cited by
The Role of Deep Learning Regularizations on Actors in Offline RL
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Deep learning regularization techniques, such as dropout, layer normalization, or weight decay, are widely adopted in the construction of modern artificial neural networks, often resulting in more robust training processes and improved generalization capabilities. However, in the domain of Reinforcement Learning (RL), the application of these techniques has been limited, usually applied to value function estimators (Hiraoka et al., 2021; Smith et al., 2022), and may result in detrimental effects. This issue is even more pronounced in offline RL settings, which bear greater similarity to supervised learning but have received less attention. Recent work in continuous offline RL (Park et al., 2024) has demonstrated that while we can build sufficiently powerful critic networks, the generalization of actor networks remains a bottleneck. In this study, we empirically show that applying standard regularization techniques to actor networks in offline RL actor-critic algorithms yields improvements of 6% on average across two algorithms and three different continuous D4RL domains.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SERNF: Sample-Efficient Real-World Dexterous Policy Fine-Tuning via Action-Chunked Critics and Normalizing Flows
SERNF fine-tunes dexterous manipulation policies on real hardware by pairing normalizing-flow policies with action-chunked critics and conservative off-policy RL.
-
ReBRAC-v2: The Return of the King
A fixed-recipe offline RL method combining normalizing-flow actors, categorical critics, staged training, and test-time refinement beats recent flow-based baselines by 22.5 points averaged over ten OGBench categories.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.