REVIEW 2 cited by
CliquePH: Higher-Order Information for Graph Neural Networks through Persistent Homology on Clique Graphs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Graph neural networks have become the default choice by practitioners for graph learning tasks such as graph classification and node classification. Nevertheless, popular graph neural network models still struggle to capture higher-order information, i.e., information that goes \emph{beyond} pairwise interactions. Recent work has shown that persistent homology, a tool from topological data analysis, can enrich graph neural networks with topological information that they otherwise could not capture. Calculating such features is efficient for dimension 0 (connected components) and dimension 1 (cycles). However, when it comes to higher-order structures, it does not scale well, with a complexity of $O(n^d)$, where $n$ is the number of nodes and $d$ is the order of the structures. In this work, we introduce a novel method that extracts information about higher-order structures in the graph while still using the efficient low-dimensional persistent homology algorithm. On standard benchmark datasets, we show that our method can lead to up to $31\%$ improvements in test accuracy.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Heat Kernel Goes Topological
TopoHKS defines a weighted combinatorial-complex Laplacian and heat kernel descriptor, claiming maximal expressive power; the supporting uniqueness theorem is incorrect.
-
CellCLAT: Preserving Topology and Trimming Redundancy in Self-Supervised Cellular Contrastive Learning
CellCLAT applies parameter-perturbation contrastive learning to cellular complexes and adaptively trims 2-cells to improve downstream graph classification.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.