Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

MEOW: MEMOry Supervised LLM Unlearning Via Inverted Facts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.11844 v1 pith:PMQ63XPO submitted 2024-09-18 cs.CL cs.AI

MEOW: MEMOry Supervised LLM Unlearning Via Inverted Facts

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords meowunlearningfactsinvertedllmschallengesdataeffective
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) can memorize sensitive information, raising concerns about potential misuse. LLM Unlearning, a post-hoc approach to remove this information from trained LLMs, offers a promising solution to mitigate these risks. However, previous practices face three key challenges: 1. Utility: successful unlearning often causes catastrophic collapse on unrelated tasks. 2. Efficiency: many methods either involve adding similarly sized models, which slows down unlearning or inference, or require retain data that are difficult to obtain. 3. Robustness: even effective methods may still leak data via extraction techniques. To address these challenges, we propose MEOW, a simple yet effective gradient descent-based unlearning method. Specifically, we use an offline LLM to generate a set of inverted facts. Then, we design a new metric, MEMO, to quantify memorization in LLMs. Finally, based on the signals provided by MEMO, we select the most appropriate set of inverted facts and finetune the model based on them. We evaluate MEOW on the commonly used unlearn benchmark, ToFU, with Llama2-7B-Chat and Phi-1.5B, and test it on both NLU and NLG tasks. Results demonstrate significant improvement of MEOW in forget quality without substantial loss in model utility. Meanwhile, MEOW does not exhibit significant degradation in NLU or NLG capabilities, and there is even a slight improvement in NLU performance.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Wisdom is Knowing What not to Say: Hallucination-Free LLMs Unlearning via Attention Shifting

    cs.CL 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Attention-Shifting uses importance-aware suppression on unlearning data and retention enhancement on retained data via dual-loss optimization to achieve selective unlearning with better utility preservation than prior...

  2. Position: The Term "Machine Unlearning" Is Overused in LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-05 accept novelty 5.0

    Machine unlearning should be restricted to dataset-defined deletion achieving retraining equivalence, while other LLM tasks require separate terminology and evaluation baselines.