REVIEW 2 cited by
Policy Maps: Tools for Guiding the Unbounded Space of LLM Behaviors
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
AI policy sets boundaries on acceptable behavior for AI models, but this is challenging in the context of large language models (LLMs): how do you ensure coverage over a vast behavior space? We introduce policy maps, an approach to AI policy design inspired by the practice of physical mapmaking. Instead of aiming for full coverage, policy maps aid effective navigation through intentional design choices about which aspects to capture and which to abstract away. With Policy Projector, an interactive tool for designing LLM policy maps, an AI practitioner can survey the landscape of model input-output pairs, define custom regions (e.g., "violence"), and navigate these regions with if-then policy rules that can act on LLM outputs (e.g., if output contains "violence" and "graphic details," then rewrite without "graphic details"). Policy Projector supports interactive policy authoring using LLM classification and steering and a map visualization reflecting the AI practitioner's work. In an evaluation with 12 AI safety experts, our system helps policy designers craft policies around problematic model behaviors such as incorrect gender assumptions and handling of immediate physical safety threats.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Statutory Construction and Interpretation for Artificial Intelligence
Prompt-based legal canons and iterative rule refinement reduce disagreement among LLM judges about whether a response complies with natural-language rules.
-
Supporting AI-Augmented Meta-Decision Making with InDecision
AI can support 'deciding how to decide' by provoking reflection on concrete options, and InDecision demonstrates an early prototype of this idea.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.