Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Policy Maps: Tools for Guiding the Unbounded Space of LLM Behaviors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.18203 v2 pith:ILZ7RB5G submitted 2024-09-26 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords policymapsbehaviorbehaviorscoveragedesigndetailsgraphic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

AI policy sets boundaries on acceptable behavior for AI models, but this is challenging in the context of large language models (LLMs): how do you ensure coverage over a vast behavior space? We introduce policy maps, an approach to AI policy design inspired by the practice of physical mapmaking. Instead of aiming for full coverage, policy maps aid effective navigation through intentional design choices about which aspects to capture and which to abstract away. With Policy Projector, an interactive tool for designing LLM policy maps, an AI practitioner can survey the landscape of model input-output pairs, define custom regions (e.g., "violence"), and navigate these regions with if-then policy rules that can act on LLM outputs (e.g., if output contains "violence" and "graphic details," then rewrite without "graphic details"). Policy Projector supports interactive policy authoring using LLM classification and steering and a map visualization reflecting the AI practitioner's work. In an evaluation with 12 AI safety experts, our system helps policy designers craft policies around problematic model behaviors such as incorrect gender assumptions and handling of immediate physical safety threats.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Statutory Construction and Interpretation for Artificial Intelligence

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Prompt-based legal canons and iterative rule refinement reduce disagreement among LLM judges about whether a response complies with natural-language rules.

  2. Supporting AI-Augmented Meta-Decision Making with InDecision

    cs.HC 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AI can support 'deciding how to decide' by provoking reflection on concrete options, and InDecision demonstrates an early prototype of this idea.

Pith tools