Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Dual Cone Gradient Descent for Training Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.18426 v2 pith:YOYJ7TJQ submitted 2024-09-27 cs.LG cs.NAmath.APmath.NAmath.OCstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.NAmath.APmath.NAmath.OCstat.ML
keywords lossdcgdpinnsconedualgradientneuralalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a prominent approach for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) by minimizing a combined loss function that incorporates both boundary loss and PDE residual loss. Despite their remarkable empirical performance in various scientific computing tasks, PINNs often fail to generate reasonable solutions, and such pathological behaviors remain difficult to explain and resolve. In this paper, we identify that PINNs can be adversely trained when gradients of each loss function exhibit a significant imbalance in their magnitudes and present a negative inner product value. To address these issues, we propose a novel optimization framework, Dual Cone Gradient Descent (DCGD), which adjusts the direction of the updated gradient to ensure it falls within a dual cone region. This region is defined as a set of vectors where the inner products with both the gradients of the PDE residual loss and the boundary loss are non-negative. Theoretically, we analyze the convergence properties of DCGD algorithms in a non-convex setting. On a variety of benchmark equations, we demonstrate that DCGD outperforms other optimization algorithms in terms of various evaluation metrics. In particular, DCGD achieves superior predictive accuracy and enhances the stability of training for failure modes of PINNs and complex PDEs, compared to existing optimally tuned models. Moreover, DCGD can be further improved by combining it with popular strategies for PINNs, including learning rate annealing and the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK).

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Taylor-Model Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for Ordinary Differential Equations

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Taylor-Model PINNs model a Taylor-series remainder as a neural network trained via a first-order ODE loss, giving accurate short-horizon solution maps for parametric ODEs.

  2. Breaking the Precision Ceiling in Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Hybrid Fourier-Neural Architecture for Ultra-High Accuracy

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A Fourier-neural PINN achieves 1.94e-7 L2 error on a beam equation, but the 'ultra-precision' is probably due to the solution being exactly representable by the chosen Fourier modes.

Pith tools