Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A Survey on Testing and Analysis of Quantum Software

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.00650 v1 pith:6EKI2XIK submitted 2024-10-01 cs.SE quant-ph

classification cs.SEquant-ph
keywords quantumsoftwaretestinganalysisresearchsurveytechniqueswork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantum computing is getting increasing interest from both academia and industry, and the quantum software landscape has been growing rapidly. The quantum software stack comprises quantum programs, implementing algorithms, and platforms like IBM Qiskit, Google Cirq, and Microsoft Q#, enabling their development. To ensure the reliability and performance of quantum software, various techniques for testing and analyzing it have been proposed, such as test generation, bug pattern detection, and circuit optimization. However, the large amount of work and the fact that work on quantum software is performed by several research communities, make it difficult to get a comprehensive overview of the existing techniques. In this work, we provide an extensive survey of the state of the art in testing and analysis of quantum software. We discuss literature from several research communities, including quantum computing, software engineering, programming languages, and formal methods. Our survey covers a wide range of topics, including expected and unexpected behavior of quantum programs, testing techniques, program analysis approaches, optimizations, and benchmarks for testing and analyzing quantum software. We create novel connections between the discussed topics and present them in an accessible way. Finally, we discuss key challenges and open problems to inspire future research.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Methodological Analysis of Empirical Studies in Quantum Software Testing

    quant-ph 2026-01 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    A systematic analysis of 59 quantum software testing empirical studies reveals highly diverse designs, inconsistent reporting, and open methodological challenges, leading to recommendations for future work.

  2. Benchmarking Quantum Software Testing with Scalable Quantum Programs

    cs.SE 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Qolumbina curates 40 quantum programs into a benchmark with QST-oriented criteria for functionality, output behavior, and complexity to support scalable empirical studies of quantum software testing approaches.

  3. QuantumQA: Enhancing Scientific Reasoning via Physics-Consistent Dataset and Verification-Aware Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    QuantumQA dataset and verification-aware RL with adaptive reward fusion enable an 8B LLM to achieve performance competitive with proprietary models on quantum mechanics tasks.

  4. QDSV: A Semantic Problem Representation and Multi-Backend Execution Framework for Quantum-Oriented Computation

    cs.PL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    QDSV is a semantic multi-backend framework for quantum-oriented computation that maintains stable representations across simulators and hardware in an EEG classification case study on Bonn and Delhi datasets.

Pith tools