REVIEW 2 cited by
Adversarial Decoding: Generating Readable Documents for Adversarial Objectives
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We design, implement, and evaluate adversarial decoding, a new, generic text generation technique that produces readable documents for different adversarial objectives. Prior methods either produce easily detectable gibberish, or cannot handle objectives that include embedding similarity. In particular, they only work for direct attacks (such as jailbreaking) and cannot produce adversarial text for realistic indirect injection, e.g., documents that (1) are retrieved in RAG systems in response to broad classes of queries, and also (2) adversarially influence subsequent generation. We also show that fluency (low perplexity) is not sufficient to evade filtering. We measure the effectiveness of adversarial decoding for different objectives, including RAG poisoning, jailbreaking, and evasion of defensive filters, and demonstrate that it outperforms existing methods while producing readable adversarial documents.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
UniC-RAG: Universal Knowledge Corruption Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation
A universal knowledge-corruption attack uses as few as 100 crafted texts to hijack responses to thousands of diverse user queries in retrieval-augmented generation.
-
Safeguarding RAG Pipelines with GMTP: A Gradient-based Masked Token Probability Method for Poisoned Document Detection
GMTP detects poisoned RAG documents by masking high-gradient tokens and flagging documents whose masked-token probabilities are abnormally low.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.