Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Beyond Bradley-Terry Models: A General Preference Model for Language Model Alignment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.02197 v3 pith:SFR3YRL5 submitted 2024-10-03 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords modelpreferencemodelsgeneralhumanrewardpreferencesalignment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Modeling human preferences is crucial for aligning foundation models with human values. Traditional reward modeling methods, such as the Bradley-Terry (BT) reward model, fall short in expressiveness, particularly in addressing intransitive preferences. In this paper, we introduce preference embedding, an approach that embeds responses into a latent space to capture intricate preference structures efficiently, achieving linear query complexity. Additionally, we propose preference score-based General Preference Optimization (GPO), which generalizes reward-based reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Experimental results show that our General Preference embedding Model (GPM) consistently outperforms the BT reward model on the RewardBench benchmark and effectively models cyclic preferences where any BT reward model behaves like a random guess. Furthermore, evaluations on downstream tasks such as AlpacaEval2.0, following the language model post-training with GPO and our general preference model, reveal performance improvements over BT models. These findings indicate that our method may enhance the alignment of foundation models with nuanced human values. The code is available at https://github.com/general-preference/general-preference-model.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multimodal LLMs as Customized Reward Models for Text-to-Image Generation

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLaVA-Reward extracts reward scores from the hidden states of a multimodal LLM with a skip-connection cross-attention head, and reports state-of-the-art text-to-image evaluation across alignment, fidelity, and safety.

  2. DPO Unchained: Your Training Algorithm is Secretly Disentangled in Human Choice Theory (and its Loss' Convexity is Dispensable)

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DPO's connection to human choice theory generalizes: any monotone loss can pair with any choice model in a new KLST* class, so loss convexity is not normatively required.

Pith tools