Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MIBench: A Comprehensive Framework for Benchmarking Model Inversion Attack and Defense

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.05159 v3 pith:UWCEAE2S submitted 2024-10-07 cs.CV cs.CR

MIBench: A Comprehensive Framework for Benchmarking Model Inversion Attack and Defense

classification cs.CV cs.CR
keywords defensemodelattacksbenchmarkevaluationinversionattackcomprehensive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Model Inversion (MI) attacks aim at leveraging the output information of target models to reconstruct privacy-sensitive training data, raising critical concerns regarding the privacy vulnerabilities of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). Unfortunately, in tandem with the rapid evolution of MI attacks, the absence of a comprehensive benchmark with standardized metrics and reproducible implementations has emerged as a formidable challenge. This deficiency has hindered objective comparison of methodological advancements and reliable assessment of defense efficacy. To address this critical gap, we build the first practical benchmark named MIBench for systematic evaluation of model inversion attacks and defenses. This benchmark bases on an extensible and reproducible modular-based toolbox which currently integrates a total of 19 state-of-the-art attack and defense methods and encompasses 9 standardized evaluation protocols. Capitalizing on this foundation, we conduct extensive evaluation from multiple perspectives to holistically compare and analyze various methods across different scenarios, such as the impact of target resolution, model predictive power, defense performance and adversarial robustness.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Revisiting the Privacy Risks of Split Inference: A GAN-Based Data Reconstruction Attack via Progressive Feature Optimization

    cs.CV 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0

    PFO improves GAN-based split-inference reconstruction via progressive intermediate-feature optimization, but its quantitative claims rest on internally inconsistent metric tables.