Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The Same But Different: Structural Similarities and Differences in Multilingual Language Modeling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.09223 v1 pith:HQ32VZ3L submitted 2024-10-11 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords languagesmodelsemployhandleinternalllmssamewhen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We employ new tools from mechanistic interpretability in order to ask whether the internal structure of large language models (LLMs) shows correspondence to the linguistic structures which underlie the languages on which they are trained. In particular, we ask (1) when two languages employ the same morphosyntactic processes, do LLMs handle them using shared internal circuitry? and (2) when two languages require different morphosyntactic processes, do LLMs handle them using different internal circuitry? Using English and Chinese multilingual and monolingual models, we analyze the internal circuitry involved in two tasks. We find evidence that models employ the same circuit to handle the same syntactic process independently of the language in which it occurs, and that this is the case even for monolingual models trained completely independently. Moreover, we show that multilingual models employ language-specific components (attention heads and feed-forward networks) when needed to handle linguistic processes (e.g., morphological marking) that only exist in some languages. Together, our results provide new insights into how LLMs trade off between exploiting common structures and preserving linguistic differences when tasked with modeling multiple languages simultaneously.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Synthetic Data Generation for Phrase Break Prediction with Large Language Model

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-generated phrase break annotations, produced with only a few prompt examples, rival human annotations in consistency and can train competitive phrase break prediction models in English, French, and Spanish.

  2. Paths Not Taken: Understanding and Mending the Multilingual Factual Recall Pipeline

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs recall facts through an English-centric internal path and then translate the answer; injecting a translation vector and a recall vector raises accuracy by over 35 percentage points in the weakest language.

  3. Information Loss in LLMs' Multilingual Translation: The Role of Training Data, Language Proximity, and Language Family

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Round-trip translation quality in GPT-4 and Llama 2 is jointly shaped by training data volume and language distance from English, with orthographic, phylogenetic, syntactic, and geographic distances as the strongest p...

Pith tools