Pith. sign in

REVIEW 22 cited by

Imprompter: Tricking LLM Agents into Improper Tool Use

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.14923 v2 pith:EU2IPK3G submitted 2024-10-19 cs.CR

Imprompter: Tricking LLM Agents into Improper Tool Use

classification cs.CR
keywords attacksagent-basedagentsemergingsystemsagentattackautomatically
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Model (LLM) Agents are an emerging computing paradigm that blends generative machine learning with tools such as code interpreters, web browsing, email, and more generally, external resources. These agent-based systems represent an emerging shift in personal computing. We contribute to the security foundations of agent-based systems and surface a new class of automatically computed obfuscated adversarial prompt attacks that violate the confidentiality and integrity of user resources connected to an LLM agent. We show how prompt optimization techniques can find such prompts automatically given the weights of a model. We demonstrate that such attacks transfer to production-level agents. For example, we show an information exfiltration attack on Mistral's LeChat agent that analyzes a user's conversation, picks out personally identifiable information, and formats it into a valid markdown command that results in leaking that data to the attacker's server. This attack shows a nearly 80% success rate in an end-to-end evaluation. We conduct a range of experiments to characterize the efficacy of these attacks and find that they reliably work on emerging agent-based systems like Mistral's LeChat, ChatGLM, and Meta's Llama. These attacks are multimodal, and we show variants in the text-only and image domains.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 22 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. HarmfulSkillBench: How Do Harmful Skills Weaponize Your Agents?

    cs.CR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    Harmful skills in open agent ecosystems raise average harm scores from 0.27 to 0.76 across six LLMs by lowering refusal rates when tasks are presented via pre-installed skills.

  2. GUIGuard-Bench: Toward a General Evaluation for Privacy-Preserving GUI Agents

    cs.CR 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    GUIGuard-Bench is a new benchmark with annotated GUI screenshots that measures privacy recognition, planning fidelity under protection, and utility impact for trajectory-based GUI agents.

  3. Agent Data Injection Attacks are Realistic Threats to AI Agents

    cs.CR 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    Agent data injection (ADI) forges trusted agent metadata via probabilistic delimiter injection and bypasses defenses built only for instruction injection.

  4. DualView: Preventing Indirect Prompt Injection in Personal AI Agents

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    DualView extends Dual-LLM symbol isolation into the shared user environment via dual Agent/Human views, blocking both immediate and stored IPI at 0% ASR while preserving near-baseline utility.

  5. AutoDojo: Adaptive Black-Box Attacks Reveal the Limits of IPI Defenses and Task-Specification Effects in LLM Agents

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    AutoDojo adaptively optimizes IPI attacks to bypass defenses, recovering substantial ASR on action-open tasks where static attacks fail.

  6. Boiling the Frog: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Agentic Safety

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Boiling the Frog is a new stateful multi-turn benchmark that finds an aggregate 44.4% strict attack success rate for incremental safety violations across nine AI models, with rates ranging from 20.5% to 92.9%.

  7. Boiling the Frog: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Agentic Safety

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Boiling the Frog is a new stateful multi-turn benchmark for agentic safety that reports an aggregate strict attack success rate of 44.4% across nine models, with rates ranging from 20.5% to 92.9% depending on the mode...

  8. How Your Credentials Are Leaked by LLM Agent Skills: An Empirical Study

    cs.CR 2026-04 accept novelty 7.0

    Analysis of 17k LLM agent skills reveals 520 vulnerable ones with 1,708 leakage issues, primarily from debug output exposure, with a 10-pattern taxonomy and released dataset for future detection.

  9. How Your Credentials Are Leaked by LLM Agent Skills: An Empirical Study

    cs.CR 2026-04 conditional novelty 7.0

    Large-scale audit of SkillsMP agent skills finds 520 skills with 1,708 credential-leak issues, dominated by debug logging into the LLM context and hard-to-remediate forks.

  10. From Storage to Steering: Memory Control Flow Attacks on LLM Agents

    cs.CR 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Memory can be exploited to hijack LLM agents' tool selection and induce persistent behavioral deviations even against explicit instructions and safety constraints.

  11. AgentBound: Securing Execution Boundaries of AI Agents

    cs.CR 2025-10 conditional novelty 7.0

    AgentBound is the first declarative access control framework for Model Context Protocol servers that generates policies from source code at 80.9% accuracy and blocks most threats in malicious servers with negligible overhead.

  12. FaSTA$^*$: Fast-Slow Toolpath Agent with Subroutine Mining for Efficient Multi-turn Image Editing

    cs.CV 2025-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    FaSTA* combines LLM fast planning with A* search and inductive subroutine mining to create an efficient agent for multi-turn image editing tasks.

  13. Model Context Protocol (MCP): Landscape, Security Threats, and Future Research Directions

    cs.CR 2025-03 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    MCP lifecycle is defined with four phases and 16 activities; a threat taxonomy of 16 scenarios is constructed, validated via case studies, and paired with phase-specific safeguards.

  14. From Storage to Steering: Memory Control Flow Attacks on LLM Agents

    cs.CR 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.5

    Malicious action-oriented policies written into LLM agent memory can persistently force risky tool choice and reordering across later benign tasks, with >90% attack success in controlled audits.

  15. Agent Security Needs Redefinition through a Holistic Framework

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Agent security should be redefined around four contextual authorization properties instead of the content of the action performed.

  16. SAIGuard: Communication-State Simulation for Proactive Defense of LLM Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.MA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    SAIGuard uses communication-state simulation on the MAS interaction graph to detect and sanitize risky messages via reconstruction deviations, reducing attack success while preserving utility.

  17. "I Strongly Suspect This Website Is a Scam": Benchmarking PII Leakage and Detection without Defense in Autonomous Web Agents

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    New benchmark Scammer4U finds 54-93% critical PII leakage from frontier web agents on scam sites versus 0% on benign twins, plus a 30-point gap between verbalized suspicion and actual submission.

  18. AgentSentinel: An End-to-End and Real-Time Security Defense Framework for Computer-Use Agents

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    AgentSentinel combines system-level tracing with LLM-based auditing to block 79.6% of attacks in the authors' 60-scenario computer-use agent benchmark.

  19. WARD: Adversarially Robust Defense of Web Agents Against Prompt Injections

    cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    WARD is a guard model trained on 177K web samples and adversarially hardened via attacker-guard co-evolution to achieve high recall on prompt injections with low false positives and no added latency.

  20. Security Threat Modeling for Emerging AI-Agent Protocols: A Comparative Analysis of MCP, A2A, Agora, and ANP

    cs.CR 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The paper identifies twelve protocol-level security risks across MCP, A2A, Agora, and ANP and quantifies wrong-provider tool execution risk in MCP via a measurement-driven case study on multi-server composition.

  21. Assessing Automated Prompt Injection Attacks in Agentic Environments

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Black-box optimization outperforms gradient-based methods for prompt injection on LLM agents, with success depending on attacker model strength and limited transfer from small to frontier models.

  22. Agentic AI Security: Threats, Defenses, Evaluation, and Open Challenges

    cs.AI 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    A survey that taxonomizes threats to agentic AI, reviews benchmarks and evaluation methods, discusses technical and governance defenses, and identifies open challenges.