Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Improving Model Evaluation using SMART Filtering of Benchmark Datasets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.20245 v2 pith:KFELEO3L submitted 2024-10-26 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords examplesdatasetssmartbenchmarkchallengingevaluationfilteringapproach
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

One of the most challenging problems facing NLP today is evaluation. Some of the most pressing issues pertain to benchmark saturation, data contamination, and diversity in the quality of test examples. To address these concerns, we propose Selection Methodology for Accurate, Reduced, and Targeted (SMART) filtering, a novel approach to select a high-quality subset of examples from existing benchmark datasets by systematically removing less informative and less challenging examples. Our approach applies three filtering criteria, removing (i) easy examples, (ii) data-contaminated examples, and (iii) examples that are similar to each other based on distance in an embedding space. We demonstrate the effectiveness of SMART on three multiple choice QA datasets, where our methodology increases efficiency by reducing dataset size by 48\% on average, while increasing Pearson correlation with rankings from ChatBot Arena, a more open-ended human evaluation setting. Our method enables us to be more efficient, whether using SMART to make new benchmarks more challenging or to revitalize older datasets, while still preserving the relative model rankings.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fluid Language Model Benchmarking

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    Fluid Benchmarking, combining IRT-based ability estimation with Fisher-information-based adaptive item selection, improves LM evaluation across efficiency, validity, variance, and saturation in pretraining settings.

  2. Pretraining on the Test Set Is No Longer All You Need: A Debate-Driven Approach to QA Benchmarks

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A debate-based evaluation protocol on 50 MMLU-Pro questions: fine-tuning on the test set boosts standard accuracy from 50% to 82% but not debate win rates.

Pith tools