REVIEW 3 cited by
Comparative Analysis of Demonstration Selection Algorithms for LLM In-Context Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In-context learning can help Large Language Models (LLMs) to adapt new tasks without additional training. However, this performance heavily depends on the quality of the demonstrations, driving research into effective demonstration selection algorithms to optimize this process. These algorithms assist users in selecting the best $k$ input-label pairs (demonstration examples) based on a given test input, enabling LLMs to in-context learn the relationship between the provided examples and the test inputs. Despite all the proposed demonstration selection algorithms, their efficiency and effectiveness remain unclear. This lack of clarity make it difficult to apply these algorithms in real-world scenarios and poses challenges for future research aimed at developing improved methods. This paper revisits six proposed algorithms, evaluating them on five datasets from both efficiency and effectiveness perspectives. Our experiments reveal significant variations in algorithm performance across different tasks, with some methods struggling to outperform random selection in certain scenarios. We also find that increasing the number of demonstrations does not always lead to better performance, and that there are often trade-offs between accuracy and computational efficiency. Our code is available at https://github.com/Tizzzzy/Demonstration_Selection_Overview.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Surprise Calibration for Better In-Context Learning
Surprise Calibration uses the model's own surprise at each demonstration's label to dynamically correct class priors in in-context learning, improving accuracy on eight NLP benchmarks.
-
SLM-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Small Language Models on Environmental Impacts--Extended Version
A new benchmark of 15 small language models across 23 datasets and 11 metrics shows clear accuracy-versus-energy trade-offs, with no single model dominating.
-
Factors affecting the in-context learning abilities of LLMs for dialogue state tracking
User-only embedding retrieval and speaker tags modestly improve few-shot dialogue state tracking with in-context learning on open LLMs.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.