Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

All or None: Identifiable Linear Properties of Next-token Predictors in Language Modeling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.23501 v2 pith:66YRFMTC submitted 2024-10-30 stat.ML cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
keywords linearnext-tokenpredictorspropertiesdistribution-equivalentidentifiabilitylanguagelinearity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We analyze identifiability as a possible explanation for the ubiquity of linear properties across language models, such as the vector difference between the representations of "easy" and "easiest" being parallel to that between "lucky" and "luckiest". For this, we ask whether finding a linear property in one model implies that any model that induces the same distribution has that property, too. To answer that, we first prove an identifiability result to characterize distribution-equivalent next-token predictors, lifting a diversity requirement of previous results. Second, based on a refinement of relational linearity [Paccanaro and Hinton, 2001; Hernandez et al., 2024], we show how many notions of linearity are amenable to our analysis. Finally, we show that under suitable conditions, these linear properties either hold in all or none distribution-equivalent next-token predictors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. What is causal about causal models and representations?

    stat.ML 2025-01 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    Under the natural interpretation of actions as interventions, every causal Bayesian network that matches observational data is trivially interventionally valid, so interventional data cannot falsify causal models.

Pith tools