Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Simulating User Agents for Embodied Conversational-AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.23535 v1 pith:4JZUKWLC submitted 2024-10-31 cs.CL cs.AIcs.RO

Simulating User Agents for Embodied Conversational-AI

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.RO
keywords useragentembodiedpromptingrobotagentsdialogueslanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Embodied agents designed to assist users with tasks must engage in natural language interactions, interpret instructions, execute actions, and communicate effectively to resolve issues. However, collecting large-scale, diverse datasets of situated human-robot dialogues to train and evaluate such agents is expensive, labor-intensive, and time-consuming. To address this challenge, we propose building a large language model (LLM)-based user agent that can simulate user behavior during interactions with an embodied agent in a virtual environment. Given a user goal (e.g., make breakfast), at each time step, the user agent may observe" the robot actions or speak" to either intervene with the robot or answer questions. Such a user agent assists in improving the scalability and efficiency of embodied dialogues dataset generation and is critical for enhancing and evaluating the robot's interaction and task completion ability, as well as for research in reinforcement learning using AI feedback. We evaluate our user agent's ability to generate human-like behaviors by comparing its simulated dialogues with the TEACh dataset. We perform three experiments: zero-shot prompting to predict dialogue acts, few-shot prompting, and fine-tuning on the TEACh training subset. Results show the LLM-based user agent achieves an F-measure of 42% with zero-shot prompting and 43.4% with few-shot prompting in mimicking human speaking behavior. Through fine-tuning, performance in deciding when to speak remained stable, while deciding what to say improved from 51.1% to 62.5%. These findings showcase the feasibility of the proposed approach for assessing and enhancing the effectiveness of robot task completion through natural language communication.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exploratory, Communicative, and Deployable: Vision-Driven Embodied Agents for Open-World Mobile Manipulation

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    REAL, a benchmark and trained vision-language agent for oracle-free mobile manipulation with user interaction, achieves 78.3% end-to-end success on 60 physical-robot episodes after simulation-only high-level training.

  2. ProEval: Proactive Failure Discovery and Efficient Performance Estimation for Generative AI Evaluation

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ProEval is a proactive framework using pre-trained GPs, Bayesian quadrature, and superlevel set sampling to estimate performance and find failures in generative AI with 8-65x fewer samples than baselines.

  3. ProEval: Proactive Failure Discovery and Efficient Performance Estimation for Generative AI Evaluation

    cs.LG 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    Bayesian deep learning method rankings are unreliable under data scarcity, reversing across datasets and sample sizes, and a hierarchical Bayesian framework with predictive detectability curves is needed to assess eva...