Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

DynaSplit: A Hardware-Software Co-Design Framework for Energy-Aware Inference on Edge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.23881 v1 pith:XC7QHPLE submitted 2024-10-31 cs.DC cs.LGcs.SE

classification cs.DCcs.LGcs.SE
keywords hardwaredynasplitedgeenergysplitcomparedcomputationconfigures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The deployment of ML models on edge devices is challenged by limited computational resources and energy availability. While split computing enables the decomposition of large neural networks (NNs) and allows partial computation on both edge and cloud devices, identifying the most suitable split layer and hardware configurations is a non-trivial task. This process is in fact hindered by the large configuration space, the non-linear dependencies between software and hardware parameters, the heterogeneous hardware and energy characteristics, and the dynamic workload conditions. To overcome this challenge, we propose DynaSplit, a two-phase framework that dynamically configures parameters across both software (i.e., split layer) and hardware (e.g., accelerator usage, CPU frequency). During the Offline Phase, we solve a multi-objective optimization problem with a meta-heuristic approach to discover optimal settings. During the Online Phase, a scheduling algorithm identifies the most suitable settings for an incoming inference request and configures the system accordingly. We evaluate DynaSplit using popular pre-trained NNs on a real-world testbed. Experimental results show a reduction in energy consumption up to 72% compared to cloud-only computation, while meeting ~90% of user request's latency threshold compared to baselines.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Sustainability of AI Inferences in the Edge

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A cross-platform measurement study of accuracy, speed, power, and memory for classical ML, deep learning, and LLM inference on four edge devices, with parameter tuning guidelines.

Pith tools