Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

FactTest: Factuality Testing in Large Language Models with Finite-Sample and Distribution-Free Guarantees

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.02603 v3 pith:RBTMX6SK submitted 2024-11-04 cs.CL cs.AIstat.ML

FactTest: Factuality Testing in Large Language Models with Finite-Sample and Distribution-Free Guarantees

classification cs.CL cs.AIstat.ML
keywords facttestfactualityguaranteeshallucinationstestingtypecontentcontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The propensity of Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate hallucinations and non-factual content undermines their reliability in high-stakes domains, where rigorous control over Type I errors (the conditional probability of incorrectly classifying hallucinations as truthful content) is essential. Despite its importance, formal verification of LLM factuality with such guarantees remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we introduce FactTest, a novel framework that statistically assesses whether a LLM can confidently provide correct answers to given questions with high-probability correctness guarantees. We formulate factuality testing as hypothesis testing problem to enforce an upper bound of Type I errors at user-specified significance levels. Notably, we prove that our framework also ensures strong Type II error control under mild conditions and can be extended to maintain its effectiveness when covariate shifts exist. Our approach is distribution-free and works for any number of human-annotated samples. It is model-agnostic and applies to any black-box or white-box LM. Extensive experiments on question-answering (QA) and multiple-choice benchmarks demonstrate that FactTest effectively detects hallucinations and improves the model's ability to abstain from answering unknown questions, leading to an over 40% accuracy improvement.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. No-Worse Context-Aware Decoding: Preventing Neutral Regression in Context-Conditioned Generation

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    NWCAD uses a two-stream setup with a two-stage gate to prevent accuracy drops on baseline-correct items under non-informative contexts while retaining gains from helpful contexts.